[PATCH] doubt in _dl_exit
Bernhard Fischer
rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Tue Jun 3 05:07:44 PDT 2008
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:49:53PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> Could somebody who uses ldso please have a look if this breaks his
>> setup?
>>
>> $ size ldso/ldso/ldso.oS*
>> text data bss dec hex filename
>> 12424 12 72 12508 30dc ldso/ldso/ldso.oS.old
>> 12290 12 72 12374 3056 ldso/ldso/ldso.oS
>>
>> @@ -59,7 +59,11 @@
>> dynamic linking at all, so we cannot return any error codes.
>> We just punt if there is an error. */
>> #define __NR__dl_exit __NR_exit
>> -static __always_inline _syscall1(void, _dl_exit, int, status);
>> +static __always_inline attribute_noreturn void _dl_exit(int status)
>> +{
>> + while (1)
>> + INLINE_SYSCALL(exit, 1, status);
>> +}
>>
> Hi Bernd,
> I've just now the chance to update my repo and figured out that this
> brakes sh4 build.
> My you explain the rationale for this change ?
http://busybox.net/lists/uclibc/2008-May/019394.html
I'm not opposed to reverting that hunk but that explicit variant was
better, imho.
More information about the uClibc
mailing list